Home
/
Crypto news
/
Latest news
/

The truth behind wal mart and ibm's blockchain project

Crypto Skepticism Grows | Claims of Blockchain Use Case Fizzled Out

By

James Smith

Aug 14, 2025, 06:33 AM

Edited By

Nicolas Brown

3 minutes of duration

A visual representation of WalMart and IBM logos with a broken blockchain symbol, illustrating the failed blockchain supply chain project.
popular

A controversial narrative persists among some enthusiasts claiming the successful use of blockchain technology by big players like Walmart and IBM for supply chain tracking. However, this assertion may lack substantial grounding, as a press release from 2021 highlights that the project faced significant hurdles and was ultimately discontinued within a year.

Unpacking the Claims

Critics argue that the promise of blockchain's transformative capabilities often boils down to hype. One commenter pointed out, "It isn’t a big deal if they find nothing and they don’t want to miss any opportunities." This skepticism reflects a broader unease among people about overstated claims in the crypto field.

Notable Issues Raised

Several key themes emerged from public discourse regarding these blockchain claims:

  • Lack of Accountability: Commentators assert that blockchain projects often fail to deliver genuine accountability, with one stating, "With blockchain, you still need to trust various third parties."

  • Counterparty Risk: Users argue that crypto does not eliminate counterparty risks, but merely shifts the responsibility to unregulated operators. One commenter summarized this sentiment: "In reality, Bitcoin and crypto doesn’t eliminate counterparty risk or middlemen."

  • Vague Use Cases: Many dismiss claims for self-sovereign identity or decentralized finance as mere buzzwords without actionable benefits. "Decentralization isn’t a feature unless it proves to be advantageous," critiqued another user.

What Happened to the Walmart Project?

The ambitious initiative between Walmart and IBM was touted as a game-changer, yet it quietly faded away, prompting questions about the validity of similar claims in the crypto arena today. Critics emphasize the importance of tangible results over marketing narratives, with one user bluntly stating, "Use case? Scamming."

"If it weren’t the case, there should be hundreds of successful use cases by now."

Sentiment Assessment

The overall sentiment skews negative, with many users expressing frustration over the apparent disconnect between promises and reality. Skepticism about the tech and its supposed benefits resonates throughout the community, particularly as previous projects continue to underwhelm.

Key Insights

  • 30,000+ cryptocurrencies have failed, leaving users questioning the longevity of existing blockchains.

  • Blockchain’s reliance on third parties undermines claims of it being a trustless system.

  • Many enthusiasts seem stuck on the idea of large companies adopting crypto, despite past failures.

Whether blockchain can ultimately deliver on its promise remains to be seen. Until demonstrated success stories multiply, skepticism will likely persist in the crypto community.

What to Expect in the World of Blockchain

As the crypto landscape continues to evolve, there’s a strong chance that skepticism around blockchain technology will shape future initiatives. With experts estimating that around 60% of new projects might face similar difficulties as the Walmart-IBM collaboration, companies could push for concrete use cases over flashy promises. This trend may lead to a more cautious approach in tech investments, where transparency and proven reliability take precedence over ambitious claims. In the coming years, we could see a shift where only the most viable blockchain solutions survive, potentially weeding out projects that don’t deliver on their promises.

Echoes from the Dot-Com Era

The current landscape mirrors the burst of the dot-com bubble in the early 2000s, when countless companies launched with grand visions yet failed to establish a substantial business model. Like many blockchain projects today, those firms had ideas that sounded great but struggled under the weight of reality. Just as the dust settled after the bubble's burst, bringing forth a leaner, more innovative tech ecosystem, the same could happen with blockchain. It may take time, but this cycle of trial, error, and eventual purification could pave the way for a stronger foundation in the world of blockchain.