Home
/
Market analysis
/
Technical analysis
/

Understanding axiom trading fees: why small gains hurt

Axiom Trading Fees | Users Confused by Unexpected Losses on Memecoins

By

Omar Ali

Jul 7, 2025, 03:32 AM

Edited By

David Lee

3 minutes of duration

A visual representation of trading fees affecting small profits, showing a person looking concerned as they review their earnings on a computer screen with a graph and charts in the background.
popular

A growing number of traders are expressing confusion over trading fees associated with platforms like Axiom and others as they report losing money even after making modest gains on memecoins. This concern is gaining traction following multiple posts and discussions in various forums this week.

Trading Gains Turning into Losses

Traders are mostly complaining about trading fees when converting small amounts of memecoins back to Solana. Several comments highlight that even gains of around 10% can result in net losses due to various fees involved in swapping tokens.

One user noted, "When I make any gains on a memecoin somewhere below 10%, I actually lose money when I convert back to Solana." This has left many wondering if a minimum investment threshold would guarantee profits on small gains.

Fees Stack Up Quickly

Comments from the community reveal a few critical factors affecting trading costs:

  • Transaction Fees: Most trading platforms, including Axiom, charge a fee typically starting at 1% per transaction. Some tokens have additional fees if they are not bonded, reaching up to 2%.

  • Slippage and Priority Fees: When trading, users can experience slippageβ€”a deviation in expected prices, especially on small trades. One user advises setting slippage tolerance at 0.1% while trading.

  • Liquidity Pools: These pools can also deduct a percentage from trades. For instance, trading on platforms like Raydium can lead to fees of up to 4%, depending on pool types.

Additionally, "If you’re trading tokens like PumpFun or BonkFun, the launchpad takes a fee on each transaction," warned a forum participant.

Seeking Better Options

Many traders are recommending alternatives to Axiom. Some have found that using aggregators like Jupiter or platforms like Raydium can yield better rates due to lower fees. Curiously, one user sums it up, saying, "With that amount of money, it’s better to swap on Raydium or Jupiter"

Community Insights

The sentiment in the forums remains mostly negative concerning fees, with many expressing frustration at losing money on what should be profitable trades. However, users remain hopeful that increased awareness around these fees can help them make more informed trading decisions.

Key Highlights

  • πŸ”½ Users report unexpected losses due to combined fees

  • ⚠️ Slippage and transaction fees significantly impact returns

  • βœ… Alternative platforms like Raydium and Jupiter suggested for lower costs

As more people jump into trading, understanding these fees will be crucial to turning a profitβ€”especially when dealing with smaller amounts.

The discussion continues on various forums, with users sharing strategies and experiences to combat feasting fees and better navigate this complex trading environment.

Future Trends in Trading Fees

There’s a strong chance we’ll see trading platforms reassess their fee structures in response to the growing dissatisfaction among traders. As more people turn to memecoins and express frustration over losing money, platforms like Axiom may introduce lower fees or alternative pricing models to remain competitive. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that platforms will adopt these changes in the next six months as they seek to attract and retain a larger user base. Additionally, aggregators like Jupiter and Raydium could gain further traction, possibly leading to a shift where decentralized exchanges become the go-to option for savvy traders seeking to minimize costs.

Lessons from Retail Meltdowns

The current scenario in crypto trading bears a resemblance to the retail disruptions experienced during the early days of e-commerce. In the late 1990s, many consumers turned to online shopping only to be blindsided by hidden fees and shipping costs that negated their savings. Just like today’s traders, those early adopters faced a learning curve that prompted them to share their experiences on forums for better buying practices. This community-driven approach helped consumers navigate online markets more effectivelyβ€”signaling a similar evolution ahead for crypto enthusiasts as they learn from past missteps and advocate for better practices.