Home
/
Investment guides
/
Tax implications
/

3 key tax questions about reporting digital assets losses

Navigating Tax Forms | Confusion Grows Over Celsius Loss Reporting

By

Meltem Demirors

Apr 10, 2025, 06:11 AM

Edited By

Ravi Patel

2 minutes of duration

An informative visual guide to understanding IRS Form 4684 for Celsius-related losses

Amid complex tax regulations for cryptocurrency, many facing losses from Celsius are questioning the right approach for reporting these on Form 4684. Users are grappling with uncertainties about how to effectively navigate the digital assets tax box on Form 1040 while dealing with the aftermath of Celsius's bankruptcy.

As tax season progresses in 2025, individuals eligible to claim losses from Celsius are diving into the details of the IRS Form 4684 method. Many find themselves unsure whether to mark "yes" in the Digital Assets box on Form 1040, especially since some rewards earned from Celsius seem to be deemed acceptable under IRS guidelines. However, with no rewards accrued in the current tax year due to bankruptcy, questions arise about reporting obligations.

In online discussions, users highlight an unsettling trend in how the reporting should be approached as well as the necessity for clarity on cost basis calculations. Does marking "yes" mean they must report each reward, or does completing Form 4684 suffice?

Additionally, a consensus is slowly evolving regarding cost basis reportingβ€”some argue it should be calculated individually per reward, while others say grouping by coin is more straightforward. Clarity around these issues is critical; many express frustration, stating the lack of uniform guidance from the IRS only deepens their confusion. As one participant succinctly put it, "Check the box," suggesting a simpler approach might alleviate some pressure.

In light of these challenges, the community is actively seeking templates and guidelines for supplemental documentation. Members are keen on including details like:

  • The nature of the loss

  • How it qualifies under IRC Β§ 165(c)(2) as a theft loss

  • Calculating the reported loss

  • Assigning cost basis for any returned BTC or ETH

"This sets dangerous precedent," warns one user, reflecting a sentiment of apprehension about IRS interpretations and their potential ramifications on cryptocurrency regulation.

Community Sentiment: A Mixed Bag

The dialogue around this topic reveals mixed sentiments, with users sharing both optimism and skepticism. Many are eager to comply correctly but voice anxiety over potential repercussions of their choices. The initial responses show a trend:

  • Gratitude: Some express thanks for proactive guidance from CPAs and community resources.

  • Confusion: Several users postulate the need for clearer guidelines, highlighting overwhelming complexities.

  • Frustration: A noticeable amount of commentary indicates fatigue over changing regulations and lack of straightforward instructions.

Key Insights πŸ“Š

  • πŸ”Ή A growing number of individuals urging IRS clarification on Digital Assets.

  • πŸ”Έ Many believe the current reporting methods impose undue burden on taxpayers.

  • 🌟 Some participants stress that relying on community-generated templates can ease the tax filing process.

As those affected by Celsius losses adjust to navigating tax liabilities, the sentiment surrounding crypto taxation remains fraught with complexity. Taxpayers are encouraged to stay informed and seek guidance as they prepare their documentation, ensuring nothing falls through the cracks. Stay tuned for updates as this developing story unfolds.