Home
/
Community insights
/
Forums and discussions
/

State mandated privacy erosion: a growing concern

State-Mandated Privacy Erosion | Concerns Mounting Over Monero's Future Security

By

Derek Johnson

Aug 5, 2025, 12:49 PM

Updated

Aug 7, 2025, 07:38 AM

2 minutes of duration

A person looking concerned while viewing a computer screen displaying surveillance cameras and data charts, representing privacy concerns.
popular

A growing coalition of people expresses skepticism about the future of privacy coins like Monero. Recent discussions on forums highlight fears of coordinated attacks from state entities, particularly given Monero’s increasing notoriety within the crypto space.

The Current Landscape

As more scrutiny arises, numerous participants question Monero's ability to resist government pressures. One commenter expressed concern, asking, "What if there was a combined effort from the EU to overthrow Monero? Is it just over?" This underscores the broader apprehensions regarding government involvement in cryptocurrencies.

Key Concerns from Recent Discussions

  1. Network Vulnerability

    Participants note Monero has faced ongoing attacks since 2018, including increased regulatory scrutiny. Many stress that threats could escalate if state actors become more determined. A user remarked, "If some random dude from Belarus can threaten Monero, imagine what a state actor could do."

  2. Market Dynamics and Security

    There is significant concern that Monero's price must rise for its long-term viability. Some argue that a lack of value hampers security. A comment stated, "Monero needs to rise in price for the sake of network security."

    Additionally, one individual criticized proof-of-stake proposals, arguing that only proof-of-work systems empower individuals.

    "You cannot outhash a nation-state but you want to outstake it?"

    This highlights the ongoing debate about the most secure methods for managing decentralized currencies.

  3. Corruption Issues and Future Degradation

    Distrust in government influences is palpable among community members. Comments reflect a belief that a push for traceable assets may lead to the erosion of privacy-centered currencies. One commenter said, "The idea that online RealID or other traceable asset won’t be added… is a dream."

Sentiment Trends in the Community

The discussions reveal a largely negative outlook regarding the survival and stability of privacy-focused currencies. Participants express fears of financial manipulation and the broad implications for personal privacy.

Key Insights

  • πŸ”’ "If some random dude from Belarus can threaten Monero"

  • πŸ“ˆ Price increases are seen as essential for long-term security.

  • 🌍 A sense of "Orchestrated attempts" to undermine Monero's stability has emerged.

As individuals within the crypto community navigate these apprehensions, the ongoing implications of state involvement in privacy and decentralization remain hot topics. The situation is evolving, with many closely monitoring how these dynamics will progress.