A recent forum post recounts a humorous encounter where an individual outsmarted a crypto scammer during a phone call. By inventing a fake crypto balance and wasting the scammer's time, the user illustrated how creativity can serve as a shield against fraud.
The ordeal began when the user received multiple texts claiming their Kucoin account had been compromised. Curious and skeptical, they decided to call the number provided. On the call, a scammer with a British accent alleged an unauthorized login attempt from India. The user cleverly played along, claiming to hold 16 BTC and 22.5 ETH, despite having a mere 100 USDT in their actual account.
As the phone conversation progressed, the scammer directed the user to download a wallet app for "security purposes." Instead of moving actual funds, the user feigned ignorance and playfully asked, "Could you send some money to the wallet to check if itβs working?" This tactic ensnared the scammer further. The user noted, "This was the worst scam Iβve ever seen," laughing as the scammer soured in frustration.
Ultimately, the scammer sent $5 for verification, which the user promptly transferred right back into their own account. When the scammer realized they were duped, they angrily suggested the user had too much time on their hands, unaware they had just been outwitted.
Comments on various forums reveal mixed feelings. One user remarked, "Good for you!! You got some pleasure from screwing a thief. Watch your step, donβt interact with strangers on the internet when it comes to money." Meanwhile, another commenter raised ethical dilemmas, questioning whether engaging with scammers makes one a scammer as well. This new perspective invites discussion about morality in countering fraud, where some users note:
**"If you can do this regularly, start a YouTube channel focusing on this niche. People love this kind of content!"
"Now invest that $5 into BTC and call him back in 5 years."
The blend of celebration and caution evident in the comments shows a growing awareness of scamming tactics. As people share strategies to waste scammers' time, they also emphasize the importance of vigilance.
π Creative engagement can yield laughter and potentially result in earning small amounts.
β οΈ Ethical considerations arise as people debate the implications of turning the tables.
π Scammers may adjust tactics, prompted by the rise of entertaining counter-strategies shared in online communities.
π "I've made about $40 from playing along and pretending to be stupid, but mainly just wasted their time."
The sentiment among these interactions indicates a mix of humor and cautionβpeople are excited to see someone win against fraud but aware of the risks.