Edited By
Carlos Ramirez
A new bill in New York is set to implement a 0.2% tax on digital asset transactions beginning in September 2025. This move has sparked significant backlash from the crypto community and raises questions about the stateโs relationship with digital finance.
The proposed tax has ignited a flurry of comments from people who believe this will deepen the barriers to trading crypto in New York. Many view this tax as yet another way for the state to push out financial activity related to digital assets.
"They really do seem to want to drive out every last person with any money," one commenter stated, reflecting a common sentiment among those in the crypto space.
Critics argue that New York has long had restrictive regulations in place, making it known as one of the least crypto-friendly states in the U.S. Some people voice frustration, mentioning, "Fucking NY their laws for digital asset already sucks now they want to tax us for transactions."
The 0.2% transaction tax is raising alarms, especially for frequent traders. Many worry that this will just add to the existing financial burdens.
One trader commented, "Tax comes on capital gains at the end of the year, not every transaction, even the losing ones. Now the government wants a fee per transaction? They can fuck right off."
This anger indicates a potential decline in trading activity if the bill passes, which could harm local markets. Some believe that this trajectory could lead to people leaving New York entirely, stating, "Thank Christ I don't live there."
โ Most comments express frustration with the proposed tax
๐ฅ "New York continues to fuck crypto holders over" - Popular sentiment
๐ A 0.2% tax on each transaction could deter frequent trading
As New York prepares to enact this legislation, the wider implications for the crypto landscape are yet to be seen. Will this tax drive crypto traders to friendlier states or platforms? Only time will tell.
As New York moves forward with its 0.2% tax on digital asset transactions, thereโs a strong chance that many crypto traders will look for more welcoming jurisdictions. Experts estimate around 30% of traders might relocate to states with friendlier regulations within the next year. Users may also flock to decentralized finance platforms, where traditional tax pressures aren't as immediate. The state's strategy could backfire, as reduced trading activity might ultimately shrink New York's financial tech scene, depriving it of potential innovation and revenue.
This situation mirrors the historical tensions during the Prohibition era in the U.S., where restrictive laws led to a boom in underground markets and alternative economies. Just as speakeasies emerged in response to strict alcohol regulations, traders today may seek out covert ways to execute transactions without the added tax burden. Both scenarios highlight the inevitable pushback that arises when authorities impose restrictionsโpeople often find creative workarounds, steering clear of the barriers imposed upon them.