Home
/
Crypto news
/
Latest news
/

Monero 51% attack cost rises to $320 m in 20 months

Monero Sees Doubling in 51% Attack Costs | Network Growth Sparks Security Concerns

By

Maya Thompson

Aug 16, 2025, 04:38 PM

Edited By

Cathy Hackl

3 minutes of duration

Graph showing the rise in Monero's 51% attack cost from $115 million to $320 million over 20 months, with a focus on hashrate growth
popular

A new analysis reveals the cost of a 51% attack on Monero has skyrocketed from $115 million to approximately $320 million in just 20 months. This significant increase highlights growing challenges and security dynamics in the crypto landscape.

Rising Costs Urge Community Vigilance

In December 2023, the cost of launching a 51% attack against Monero was estimated at around $115 million, based on a network hashrate of 2.1 GH/s. Fast forward to August 2025, the hashrate nearly tripled to 6 GH/s. Current estimates suggest that to execute such an attack now, one would need about 26,666 high-end AMD EPYC 9965 CPUs, costing around $320 million.

"We can all agree that the cost of buying or renting hardware tends to rise at roughly the same rate," noted a community analyst.

Community Concerns and Criticism

Commenters are divided on the implications of these cost increases and what they mean for Monero's security. Some point out that the rising costs may still represent an inadequate defense, arguing:

  • Cost-effectiveness of Attacks: "This is pennies to take down a $4-5 billion network," one commenter remarked.

  • Security Threats: Users raised concerns about potential malicious actors leveraging cheaper resources to launch attacks, creating a chilling effect on the network's footprint.

  • Evidence of Vulnerability: Another user suggested that while costs are rising, it remains feasible for profit-driven individuals or entities to exploit weaknesses, including short positions on Monero.

User Sentiment

The community's reaction has been a mix of urgency and anxiety. Some feel optimistic about the physical growth of the network but express skepticism regarding the sustainability of mining profits amidst current cryptocurrency prices.

Takeaways:

  • πŸ”Ό 51% attack costs rose from $115M to $320M in 20 months.

  • πŸ”½ Community argues costs remain low relative to network value.

  • πŸ’¬ "If we aren’t trying to defend ourselves, we’re just hoping for the best." - Active user comment.

Final Thoughts on Monero's Security

With the rising costs of a potential attack, the focus now turns to how the community will respond. Increased vigilance and possibly innovative solutions like hybrid consensus could redefine how Monero tackles security challenges moving forward. The ongoing discourse suggests that while financial barriers exist, the threat of attack remains a profound concern that the community cannot afford to ignore.

Anticipating Community Dynamics and Security Strategies

There's a strong possibility that the Monero community will ramp up security measures in light of the soaring attack costs. Experts anticipate increased investment in new technologies aimed at fortifying the network's defenses. Given the current trajectory, it’s estimated that within the next year, community discussions may lead to the adoption of hybrid consensus methodsβ€”enhancing transaction verification and deterring potential attackers. A proactive shift in mining practices could emerge, engaging more participants in governance, with around 70% of active miners supporting tighter security protocols, reflecting a growing awareness of the impending threats.

A Case of Historical Resilience

This situation echoes the evolution seen in the early days of the internet, particularly with email security. Initially, spam was tolerated as people learned to navigate the new terrain. The rise of disruptive actors in those early years led to the development of robust email filtering systems, shaping current cyber-defense tactics. Similarly, as the crypto landscape matures, the Monero community may arise from this threat with innovative security protocols that not only safeguard their network but also redefine security standards globally. Respectively, this could parallel how nascent technologies adapt to external pressures, paving the way for more resilient infrastructures.