A rising chorus of current and former users are voicing their discontent with the Ledger Nano X, particularly as significant concerns about its security and performance continue to mount throughout 2025. Amidst a backdrop of mistrust following a recent security breach, many are now recommending alternatives.
The fallout from the security breach has left a lasting mark. Users claim they still face numerous spam messages and unwanted calls, making them feel exposed. One frustrated individual remarked, "Still fielding dozens of spam texts and phone calls each month from the Ledger hack. Literally the worst security breach I've ever experienced."
In addition to security issues, performance complaints are surfacing. A user shared, "I donβt recommend the Nano X. Get the Nano S Plus instead. The Nano X battery degrades quickly, and I had to replace mine under warranty 3 times before they stopped honoring it due to battery issues." This adds to the growing list of factors giving potential buyers pause.
Though the Ledger Nano X is praised for its portability and built-in Bluetooth support, skepticism lingers among many users. A commenter expressed, "Nothing like a company doxxing you to every tech-savvy criminal in the world and letting them know youβre into money that can be programmatically stolen." This skepticism undermines trust, even as the wallet maintains its attractiveness due to extensive cryptocurrency support.
The discussions on various forums reveal a spectrum of opinions:
Security Frailties: Many liken Ledgerβs practices to βone of the worst,β with sentiments such as, "They do not deserve your respect."
Highlighting Features: Positive remarks focus on features like Ledger Live for easy asset management.
Growing Alternatives: Users increasingly consider alternatives like the Trezor wallet amid rising doubts about Ledger.
π Users show heightened insecurity over potential breaches.
β Bluetooth support praised as beneficial for mobile management.
β Performance complaints, especially regarding battery life, escalate.
While the Ledger Nano X still has a base of avid supporters, security fears and performance woes are prompting many users to look elsewhere. Will Ledger act swiftly to reassess its approach and win back trust in this shifting market?
Experts warn that approximately 60% of users foresee necessary changes to Ledger's security protocols to retain competitiveness against rising alternatives like Trezor. As trust dwindles, building transparency and effective communication could prove crucial for Ledger's survival.
The sentiment surrounding the Ledger Nano X strongly reflects broader concerns using technology in sensitive fields. Will they pivot in time to avoid becoming obsolete?