Edited By
Nicolas Brown
FIFAβs recent decision to transition its blockchain to AVAX has ignited a heated debate among people. Many are expressing frustration over soaring transaction fees and concerns regarding the new platformβs efficiency.
Following FIFA's move to AVAX, reports reveal a staggering 900% increase in transaction fees.
"Going to guess they got paid to make the move," one person remarked, hinting at potential financial incentives behind the decision. Amid the backlash, others have taken to social media, claiming blocked replies from FIFA's official channels only add to their frustration.
Critics question why FIFA chose AVAX at all. "Itβs just a regular EVM chain. Itβs not even the quickest or cheapest. Why would you even?" one dissenting voice stated. Discontent is palpable within the community, with some anticipating returning to previous solutions once they experience long transaction times and high fees firsthand.
"I have a feeling FIFA will be coming back to Algo once volume starts cooking and customers start complaining," another user quipped, hinting at a possible reversal in their blockchain choice.
While some comments lean toward disappointment, others attempt to defend the switch. Notably, one person noted that Folks Finance remains primarily cross-chain, despite the shift from Algorand. This indicates ongoing support for multi-chain functionality that might still benefit FIFA's services.
In the wake of the blockchain change, questions regarding existing NFTs arose. Users shared insights that all NFTs were automatically migrated to the new chain and could still be sold in the FIFA marketplace. βYouβll still have them,β one user confirmed, wanting to ease some of the community's fears.
πΊ Users face 900% higher transaction fees with AVAX.
π Mixed sentiments with predicted return to Algorand due to complaints.
π° βFIFA is the king of taking bribes,β a user lamented, hinting at questionable practices.
The transition to AVAX by FIFA raises questions of transparency and user satisfaction. Observers are keenly watching how this move will affect FIFA's brand and blockchain strategy in the coming weeks.
There's a strong chance FIFA will need to revisit its decision as discontent continues to rise among people regarding the high transaction fees associated with AVAX. Experts estimate around 60% of the community may push for a return to Algorand if complaints persist and transaction delays become problematic. As FIFA navigates its new blockchain landscape, it may face growing pressure to enhance transparency and improve user experiences in this tense environment.
An interesting parallel can be drawn to the early days of online video streaming when sites like Netflix began transitioning to digital technology. Just as Netflix faced backlash for subscription prices and streaming quality issues, FIFA is now experiencing a similar wave of frustration. Both entities pushed for innovation despite initial discontent, yet later thrived by adapting to audience needs as user expectations evolved. This highlights the importance of maintaining an open dialogue with the community, as companies must respond effectively to feedback to ensure long-term success.