Home
/
Crypto news
/
Regulatory updates
/

Crypto.com ceo demands probe into $20 b exchange liquidations

Kris Marszalek Calls for Probe | $20B Liquidation Ruckus in Crypto

By

Ethan Zhang

Oct 12, 2025, 07:44 AM

Edited By

Oliver Taylor

3 minutes of duration

Crypto.com CEO Kris Marszalek speaks at a press conference, urging an investigation into trading platforms following substantial liquidations.
popular

Kris Marszalek, the CEO of Crypto.com, has called for a regulatory investigation into crypto exchanges amid a staggering $20 billion in liquidations within just one day. His demand raises significant questions about the operations and fairness of these platforms during a volatile market crash.

Context of the Liquidation

In a Saturday post on X, Marszalek urged regulators to review trading practices and evaluate whether exchanges mismanaged trades. He pointed out that "regulators should look into the exchanges that had the most liquidations," questioning whether any platforms hindered trading or mispriced assets.

The recent market turmoil has led to major players like Hyperliquid leading the liquidation chart, with $8 billion in wiped-out positions, while Bybit and Binance followed with $3 billion and $2 billion, respectively. Other exchanges, including OKX, HTX, and Gate, experienced smaller losses at $1.5 billion, $362.5 million, and $264.5 million.

User Reactions and Sentiment

Reactions within forums reveal a mix of support and skepticism towards Marszalek's call for inquiries. One comment noted, "Maybe China was the one who fked us over to get back at Trump this time." Others criticized the move as typical blame-shifting with comments like, **"Pot calling the kettle black."

** In stark contrast, some users praised Binance for maintaining functionality during these liquidity struggles, stating, "Binance was one of the few exchanges that actually worked during the crash."

What Users Are Saying

  1. Concerns Over Exchange Performance: Many comments express distrust in exchanges, suggesting foul play during the rapid liquidity events.

  2. Political Speculations: Some users speculate geopolitical influences might have affected market behavior, linking them to current administrations.

  3. Response to Panic Selling: A notable sentiment highlights fear among traders, with one remarking, "So much panic selling about nothing."

"Any of them slowing down to a halt, effectively not allowing people to trade?"

These sentiments reflect a broader anxiety about regulatory oversight and accountability in the crypto market, particularly during periods of significant volatility.

Key Takeaways

  • 🚨 $20 billion liquidated across multiple exchanges over 24 hours.

  • πŸ“‰ Hyperliquid led in liquidations, with major losses reported by Bybit and Binance.

  • πŸ” Marszalek's call for investigations shines a light on potential exchange misconduct.

As this story develops, the crypto community watches closely to see how regulators will respond and what implications this may have for future trading practices. With the stakes high, it’s a tense time for the industry.

The Road Ahead for Crypto Regulation

As the fallout from the $20 billion liquidations unfolds, there’s a strong chance that regulators will quickly respond, which could include investigations into the practices of major exchanges. Marszalek's call for scrutiny suggests that platforms may need to re-evaluate their risk management and trading strategies. Experts estimate around a 60% probability that regulators will implement stricter guidelines on trading practices to ensure fair play. This could result in enhanced transparency and a possible shakeup in how exchanges operate, as trust is critical for platforms to regain the confidence of traders amid such turmoil.

Echoes of Past Economic Waves

In a way reminiscent of the 1998 East Asian Financial Crisis, current events in the crypto world illustrate how swift market fluctuations can expose vulnerabilities in financial systems. Just as speculative investments in Southeast Asia prompted government intervention and oversight, the dramatic liquidations in crypto may trigger a similar crackdown. This parallel shows that, like the waves of economic turmoil that disrupted traditional markets, the crypto sphere must adapt and strengthen its mechanisms to build resilience and trust among its participants.