Home
/
Crypto news
/
Technology developments
/

Trust issues: rethinking bitcoin security in 2025

A growing coalition of people is pushing back against major hardware wallets, especially Ledger. Many are now looking at do-it-yourself (DIY) solutions to protect their Bitcoin holdings amidst rising distrust.

By

Aisha Khan

Jul 17, 2025, 07:44 AM

Edited By

David Lee

Updated

Jul 18, 2025, 12:46 PM

2 minutes of duration

A well-organized workspace showing a secure airgapped PC used for offline Bitcoin transactions, with a Ledger and Trezor device nearby.
popular

Hardware Wallets Under Fire

The views shared in user boards highlight a significant lack of confidence in brands like Ledger and Trezor. Some users point out Ledger's closed source code as a major concern. One comment strongly asserted, "Ledger’s word can’t be trusted. They’ve been hacked and have a history of shady practices." This tone is echoed across discussions where users share their distrust in Ledger’s ability to secure their cryptocurrencies.

In contrast, Trezor garners some support due to its open source nature. A commenter noted, "Trezor is open and trustworthy; trusting your Bitcoin to open source is safe." This distinction seems to shape user perspectives as they navigate their security options.

Growing DIY Interest

Some crypto enthusiasts are shifting toward DIY methods, emphasizing the security of a permanently air-gapped PC. One user claims they've been following this method since 2010, saying, "Get an air-gapped PC and a couple of encrypted USB sticks to keep your private keys secure." This growing trend indicates a desire to reclaim control in a space perceived as increasingly risky, with concerns mounting over data privacy.

Moreover, users highlight the importance of backing up keys and seed phrases in non-digital formats. One practical tip stated, "Just use a sheet of paper. That is the magic of Bitcoin." Such simplicity contrasts sharply with complex, mainstream storage options.

Digital Threats and Caution

As the conversation progresses, there’s an emphasis on security vigilance against scams. A growing number of warnings about phishing attacks further fuels this cautious sentiment. Users are advised to remain alert and skeptical of suspicious messages and offers.

Key Findings

  • πŸ”’ Many people are losing faith in mainstream brands and leaning towards DIY solutions.

  • πŸ’‘ Open source advantages seen as key security factors, especially for Trezor.

  • ⚠️ Scam threats are real, with phishing attacks prompting increased user caution.

"The more security, the better. If you have two-factor authentication, use it!"

While many are securing their assets with personal systems, the question remains: What does this shift mean for the future of cryptocurrency security? The balance between personal agency and the risks of relying on brands continues to evolve as more users seek to trust in themselves.

Historical Echoes in Crypto

The current climate resonates with earlier tech movements where users took their security into their own hands. As in personal computing history, today’s crypto enthusiasts are increasingly wary of traditional security solutions. The cyclical nature of technology adoption emphasizes trust and control as critical elements for users managing their digital assets.